Sponsored Links

Kamis, 09 November 2017

Sponsored Links

Amazon exec shares secrets of company's culture, tries ...
src: cdn.geekwire.com


Video Talk:Amazon (company)



Net income inconsistent

The operating income is listed as $178MM in the red. The net income is listed as -$241MM in the red. I think that if the net income is negative $241MM it should just show $241MM in the red, not -$241MM in the red. ((subst:unsigned2|11:20, 4 January 2016? (UTC)|Timmattison}}


Maps Talk:Amazon (company)



Problem

Hey clicking on the page in the article forwards you to gnaa.press, this needs fixed! -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.151.102.153 (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


You'll be able to talk to Alexa on Android phones starting this ...
src: cdn.vox-cdn.com


Monopoly

Amazon has been accused by several experts, news organizations and the President of the United States of being a monopoly. I think this is enough scrutiny to warrant a few decent paragraphs in the controversy section of the article. Since the talk about Amazon being a monopoly is so widespread, I implore you to search 'Amazon monopoly' on Google News. --JT2958 (talk) 02:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Oppose. Trump's comments are more related to Jeff Bezos owning the Washington Post than anything related to monopolies. If an anti-trust case is filed, obviously it will be relevant. Without one, it's merely speculation. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Emilie Arel Scott, CEO, Quidsi, An Amazon Company - YouTube
src: i.ytimg.com


Book reviews

Regarding this paragraph:

Following the listing of Untouchable: The Strange Life and Tragic Death of Michael Jackson, a disparaging biography of Michael Jackson by Randall Sullivan, his fans, organized via social media as "Michael Jackson's Rapid Response Team to Media Attacks", bombarded Amazon with negative reviews and negative ratings of positive reviews.

I believe that it is too trivial to be included in this article. It has a small spot in the more comprehensive Amazon.com_controversies, but I see no reason why it would hold any significance here. The section in question is long enough and already contains a link to the full article. It doesn't need mention of a few negative reviews on a book from 2013. 72.196.125.111 (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

I agree and support the removal from this article; it's not notable enough here. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Cincinnati's Amazon bid could include close to a billion dollars ...
src: www.gannett-cdn.com


Requested move 15 August 2017


Amazon, major energy user, doesn't want to talk about its ...
src: mediad.publicbroadcasting.net


Requested move 19 September 2017

Source of the article : Wikipedia

Comments
0 Comments